Concept
Over 100,000 people are on the waitlist for organ replacements with 17 passing away each day. More innovation is needed around this problem.
Longer Description
The incumbent tech of xenotransplantation (animal-to-human transplantation) is slowly reaching more advanced technology readiness. The first successful pig-to-human heart transplantation in 2022 was conducted with therapeutics company, Revivicor. Animal organs for xenotransplantations are genetically modified in multiple places, with genes added from humans and intrinsic genes knocked down to control heart size and mitigate human immune rejection (a main cause of failure/safety issues). Said immune reaction could be circumvented if there was a higher fidelity way of reconstructing human organs.
A potential mode is through blastocyst complementation - which is where whole organs of an animal can be grown in an entirely different animal. For example, scientists have shown that one can grow an entirely mouse pancreas in a rat.
To give more context on this alchemy I want to break down the terminology of blastocyst complementation:
A blastocyst is a mass of cells in early development which would otherwise become a living animal. This blastocyst has stem cells that can grow into any type of cell in the body - heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, etc.
Scientists can take cells from a mouse and cells from a rat and put them together into one blastocyst. The cells from different organisms can work together to (sometimes) grow into a healthy mouse/rat chimera (or hybrid animal). This technique is called "complementation" because the two types of cells complement each other to form a full organism.
In order for the complementation to work, editing/modification of the host animals cells must be completed (e.g. editing out genes of the rat which allow for the development of the pancreas). This deficiency is important in that it allows the cells from the other organism (e.g. mouse) to fill in the embryo development gaps, ideally making a fully new organ.
Other thoughts:
Engineering approaches to enable faster timelines, more experimental permutations could lead to increased success rates and broadened organ generation capabilities.
A technically more feasible line of research could be in better preservation methods of organs, for which there has been relatively limited studies.
Related reading
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699975/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-07159-7
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2022.1065536/full
Compound is a research and thesis-driven fund investing in frontier tech across AI/ML, robotics, crypto, and bio. We have a public database of areas we’re currently tracking and always adding to it.
Feel free to reach out if your building here or in adjacent verticals - we’d love to speak.
I actually did some work looking into this area given my father's experience with a lung transplant. Happy to chat sometime. Even some simple data work in the area could double the number of available organs. Happy to intro you to some friends at the Organ Preservation Alliance. On the organ printing side, Dean Kamen and Martine Rothblatt (founder of Sirius XM) are doing some interesting work there at United Therapeutics. I work with the XPrize leadership and have known the Peter Diamandis there for 20+ years. I usually see Dean and Martine at various XPrize leadership events there but I think Martine is going to be at Synbiobeta this year if you are going.